<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
  <title>Conflicts &amp; Capital: By the Numbers</title>
  <link>https://ciclcurrents.law.emory.edu/cc/</link>
  <description>Data releases only. Each pairs one chart with the full sourced table and a stable file.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2026 Eric Martin. The pieces and the summaries of them in this feed are all rights reserved, quotation with citation excepted. The data and the metadata this column publishes are licensed CC BY 4.0.</copyright>
  <managingEditor>Eric.martin@emory.edu (Eric Martin)</managingEditor>
  <webMaster>Eric.martin@emory.edu (Eric Martin)</webMaster>
  <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 17:18:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <atom:link href="https://ciclcurrents.law.emory.edu/cc/feed/data.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>


  <item>
    <title>By the Numbers, Release 02: How Long Can a Closed Deal Be Reopened?</title>
    <link>https://ciclcurrents.law.emory.edu/cc/data/post-closing-reach</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ciclcurrents.law.emory.edu/cc/data/post-closing-reach</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Eric Martin</dc:creator>
    <category>Foreign investment screening</category>
    <category>Post-closing risk</category>
    <category>Limitation periods</category>
    <description>Of the 44 jurisdictions with a power that can reach a completed transaction, four give the buyer a date on which the general call-in power lapses, running from an event fixed by the parties’ own transaction, which the four instruments variously put at completion, at the conclusion of the contract, or at registration. Article 4(4) of the new EU Regulation reads as an extension of national reach and would, for part of the Union, be a contraction. Sixteen of the 27 Member States carry no outer limit today, but Article 4(4) is confined to an investment not subject to a prior authorization requirement, and the file does not classify each untimed power onto that track, so the supported statement is that it would newly cap between three and fifteen of them. Article 4(5), which governs the deal that needed a filing and did not make it, changes nothing for any of the 27: every one already meets its 24-month floor, and it names no maximum at all. Law stated as of 2026-08-21.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>By the Numbers, Release 01: The Cross-Border Enforcement Network</title>
    <link>https://ciclcurrents.law.emory.edu/cc/data/enforcement-network</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ciclcurrents.law.emory.edu/cc/data/enforcement-network</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Eric Martin</dc:creator>
    <category>Recognition and enforcement</category>
    <category>Choice of court</category>
    <category>Arbitration</category>
    <category>Judicial cooperation</category>
    <description>An award is backed by one near-universal obligation; a judgment by several small treaties, one strong regional regime, and a great deal of national law. The choice between a court and a tribunal is a choice between two enforcement architectures, not between collectible and not: the award has one obligation of near-universal span, while the judgment relies on several small treaties, one strong regional regime, and each destination’s own recognition law. Law stated as of 2026-08-20.</description>
  </item>

</channel>
</rss>
